Federalism and Land Ownership

By: Ibrahim Ahmad

Updated September 06, 2007

Federalism as a political system is designed to solve identity based cultural conflicts including determining bonafide owners of a particular land according to existing customs and traditions. It is a political system well suited to address challenges related to cultural, linguistic, religious and ethnic differences between peoples who by accident or design happen to share the same destiny.  Eritrea is a nation created by accident, not design. The Italians curved portions of three distinct civilizations or cultures into one heterogeneous nation called Eritrea. Eritreans have failed in the past and present history to form a single national identity that represents the three unique cultural identities. The fact that Eritreans failed to agree on independence from the British Administration in the middle of the last century, for instance, is a testimony to their acute cultural, religious and ethnic differences. Therefore, the logical political solution that can provide a peaceful coexistence under a united national government can only be envisioned under a federal form of government that recognizes the three national identities, each with an autonomous authority over its own historical land. Land redistribution based on a particular formula to affect demographical change is unsustainable and a source of future conflict. .

The volatility of the land ownership issue in Eritrea has been exasperated by the current government’s passage of a land proclamation in 1994 that gave the exclusive ownership of the land to the government. This proclamation has been decorated by promises that all citizens are guaranteed the right of access to the land through usufruct or lease with a special government permission. Nevertheless, the government’s disregard for the right of the indigenous pastoralist of the lowland region in favor of the peasants is clearly political in nature. The crafting of laws to resettle populations from an overcrowded region into spacious fertile lands of another region under the pretext of equal opportunity and equal rights rhetoric is profoundly divisive, and is intended to effect demographic changes for the benefit of one group over the other. Federalism rejects the notion of passing unilateral laws without the consent of the people affected by those laws. Furthermore, the principle of federalism delegates land use and development matters to the states. The individual state possesses the prerogative to determine land ownership claims by its residents in consistency with the traditional and legal land ownership practices. It is therefore, the duty of the inhabitants of the particular region and their democratically elected representatives to pass laws that fairly determine the fate of private and communal land ownership.  The federal government may have jurisdiction over land designated as federal land reserved for national use such as defense and national parks. In any case, the federal and state governments are obligated by law to provide due process rights to all citizens. They are legally prevented from acting to deprive people of their property.  The dispossession of the pastoralists from their historical lands according to the so-called land proclamation of 94 would therefore be considered an illegal act of government in view of a federal system of government. This is particularly indefensible if it is evident that the legislation is discriminatory against the traditions and customs of the indigenous population of a particular area of the country.

Traditionally, land tenure in Eritrea is classified into three forms of ownership; private land or Risti, communal land or Dessa belonging to village communities and communal pastoral land used traditionally as a grazing area. The Risti and Dessa forms of ownership were mainly practiced in the Southern highland region, while the communal pastoral land was mainly practiced in the lowland region. Consequently, the land proclamation maintains the status quo in the Risti and Dessa regions with minor government paper work requirement, while takes over the vast farm and grazing lands of the western lowlands to resettle immigrants from the highland region to establish a foothold on a new frontier. This is done despite the objections of the local indigenous pastoral communities. It has been reported that some of these farming settlements have been armed by the government (Nharnet, 2004) to impose its illegal policies. The government intention to resettle landless refugees, former fighters and peasants from the southern highland region in the pastoral lowland region raises the chance of political conflict (Joireman, 1996) between the indigenous people and the migrants. A federal system of government rejects the notion of land confiscation under the pretext of land reform without the consent of the public.  Federalism will resolve all injustice including illegal land acquisition peacefully when possible, through comprehensive fair legislation conducted according to the democratic process. 

The irresponsible action of acquiring historical land without the consent of its owners is not only illegal it is counterproductive. The preservation of the traditional land tenure system has always been a deciding factor in the use or abuse of the land and its resources. Landowners who lack confidence in their property rights have little incentive to invest in or improve their property. For instance, research shows that Sumatran rubber tapers with short-term leases tend to overexploit their rubber trees, compared to permanent owners, in order to increase short-term returns (Suyanto et al. 2001:1). Therefore, it is conceivable that the new settlers will abuse the land to the extent possible, as they know that they are not the legal owners of the land. Such interference with property ownership rights leads to misuse and exploitation of the resources of the land. The legal owners, on the other hand, have a vested interest in maintaining the land in a sound environmental manner by preserving its natural habitat of trees, birds, water streams, mountains and valleys. They are cognizant of the priceless of their land. They are the stewards of that piece of land on earth.  .

It is clear from the relentless effort of the opponents that they are determined to disregard all reasonable accommodations for the interest of the indigenous people of the western lowland, the mid and northern highland and the eastern coastal regions; they have passed the so-called mother-tongue laws to marginalize the role of the Arabic language, they have forcefully assimilated the captive population into an alien culture, they passed laws to deprive our people of their ancestral lands and heritage, they have disregarded our customs, cultures and traditions. All these selected and targeted practices are being performed on the innocent indigenous people who sacrificed so dearly to enjoy the taste of freedom, peace and happiness, while the so-called opposition groups shuttle between capitals. It is indeed a testing time for our people. It is time of testing the will, the determination, the patience, the resilience, the strength, and the courage of the people. We know we will overcome all these trials and tribulations.  We have a rich culture of resistance to those who deprive our people of their land, cultural and identity. We must revive that tradition of resistance once again. It is in our nature to rise against tyrants.  We must rise again. We must also understand that given the makeup of our society, federalism is the most suitable political system available that can allow us to reclaim our lawful territory, language, culture, customs, traditions, and identity.

Works Cited

Castellani, L. G. (2000, June). Recent Developments in Land Tenure Law in Eritrea, Horn Of Africa. Retrieved August 17, 2007, from http://www.terrafirma.co.mz/downloads/Eritrean%20Land%20Law.pdf

Joireman, S. F. (1996). Eritrea:The minefield of land reform. African Affairs, 95 , pp. 269-285.

Nharnet. (2004, 3). Nharnet. Retrieved 08 21, 2007, from Land: major issue of our immediate future: http://nharnet.com/Archives/Arch_2004/March_04/land_031104.htm

World-Resources. (2002-2004). How we decide and who gets to decide often determines what we decide. Retrieved 09 07, 2007, from http://pdf.wri.org/wr2002fulltxt_001-022_chap01.pdf

 

 

 

 

The views expressed in articles published on Arkokabay.com are those of the authors alone. They do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Arakokabay.com or its Editorial Board

 

ما ينشر من مقالات في موقع عركوكباي.كوم  يعبر عن رأي صاحبه ولا يعبر بالضرورة عن رأي الموقع والقائمين عليه.

Send mail to Arkokabay  with questions, comments, opinions and/or articles

2007-05-19 18:17:Copyright © 2005 Last modified