|
THE RISE OF ISLAM THE NEGASHI
ERITREAN JEBERTI BY MOHAMMED NUR SAID WAGNEW. INTRODUCTION BY DR. YASSIN M. ABERRA
The paper was published in the ”Journal of The Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs”, Vol. IV, and No. , Pp.203-223 This
paper prepared by the young writer, Mohammed Nur, attempts to present a synoptic
survey of the long history of the ”Jeberti”- a Muslim population who inhabitant
the northern part of the Ethiopian plateau, mainly living in the southern
section of the Eritrean highland and in the Tigrai Region. These people who are
sometimes referred to as the ’diasporas’ in the sense that they live scattered
in many villages of the areas whose population predominantly profess the
Christian Orthodox religion, also live in villages of their own, that is, in
villages wholly or solely inhabited by them in the ’Anager’ ’Meragus’ and ’Mai
Tzada’ districts of Serae Province Eritrea Region and in the provinces of Shire
and Adyabo of Tigrai Region. Large conglomerations of the Jeberti population are
also found in a number of important urban centres such While the Jeberti of the rural areas are primarily engaged in agricultural and animal husbandry, the town dwellers derive their incomes from commercial and artisan activities. In fact, a large portion of the trades of a considerable number of towns has, for many years, been, and still is, in their hands. Many Jeberti are, as well, successfully engaged in international trades and industrial activities, both at home and abroad. Likewise, in addition to traditional handicraft works as such spinning, weaving, tailoring and, particularly, artistic embroiders as textile works, which have been known for centuries as their traditional and characteristic occupations, numerous Jeberti are active in quite a large number of handicrafts i.e. shoe and saddle making, carpentry, heavy truck-driving, mechanical and electrical works etc. and play significant roles in the expansion and growth of both the national economy and the economies of a remarkable number of localities within the national boundaries.
Unlike the Christians highlanders, the Jeberti, as true votaries followers of
Islam, attached great importance to commerce since the early periods of
islamization of a considerable population of northern The
social importance of the Jeberti cannot restrict only to their active
participation in the economic life of the country referred to above. In the
political movement of 1942-1952 regarding the future of the political status of The term ”Jeberti” (i.e. a collective noun used to express a single individual or collectively), as amply explained by the author in this paper, was first used to denote the first Muslim converts of Ethiopia, then known as Abyssinia, who the first fruits of Islamic penetration into the country. In fact, we can safely assert that the first Jeberti was the Nejashi (Negus), King Armac II[3] who remained, ever since, as a celebrated and venerated figure in the annals of Islam not only for the generous hospitality and protection afforded and extended to the first Arab-Muslim refugees who, escaping from the inhuman persecution administered on them by the anti-Islam heathen Arabs, sought and found asylum in his land, but also for being the first proselyte of Islam outside the Arabian Peninsula, nay even outside Mecca, the birth-place of the Prophet Muhammad and the cradle of Islam. King Armac II is probably the kingly appellation of Negus (Nejashi) for we find another name ’Ashima’ mentioned by Ibn Hisham, the celebrated biographer of the great Arabian Teacher. The Negus came also to be named by ”Ahmad” (the Praised) by the Prophet and his followers in token of, and as a manifestation of gratitude for his noble deeds.[4] The term which, afterwards, was extended to embrace all Muslims of Ethiopia, came, gradually, to be limited, first, to the Abyssinian and Agaw ethnic groups of Muslim confession (Amhara, Tigrinyan and Agaw) and, subsequently, to the Tigrinyan-speaking Muslims. The Tigrinyan-speaking Muslims, or the Jeberti, as rightly described in this monograph, are the outcome, the synthesis of two great cultural evolutions: the Axumite and the splendid Islamic civilizations; solid traits of Axum’s ancient tenants which make the Abyssinian-man unique among Africans and other Orientals for the acuteness of his mind, prudence, polite manners bravery, national pride and his high code of social behaviour are all present in the individual Jeberti, however deeply conditioned by the impact of high Islamic moralities. Islamic mental attitude, value judgements and spiritual outlook of live through centuries, came to mould the psychological set up of the Jeberti thus making human individual of particular characters and unique personality. Islamic and/or Arabic literature, rhetoric, history, theology, philosophy and anecdote, with which the average Jeberti is sufficiently versed, have further exerted pronounced impact upon the behaviour, mental attitude, linguistic expression, sentiment and outlook of the Jeberti-man. In fact, the Jeberti constitute, today, a social group distinct not only from those of the same racial stock, their Christian brethrens, but also from others ethnic groups of the country, Muslim or otherwise. These characteristic features of the Jeberti bestow upon them, ipso facto, a distinct identity, with its own culture, morality, feeling, psychological attitude, code of social behaviour, spiritual heritage, and socio-political outlook of life. The author has faithfully given a sketchy picture of the sufferings witch the Jeberti had to bear following the relentless persecutions inflicted upon them, in the course of centuries, by Christian populations, chieftains and monarchs and, particularly, by Emperor Yohannes IV. He also demonstrated that, in spite of the cruel and inhuman treatments they continually endured, the Jeberti never defected their patriotic sentiment and loyalty to the Fatherland and proved to be audacious and enthusiastic defender of their country and national interests, though often had to revolt and valiantly fight, in self-defence, against their tyrannical oppressors. The paper also clearly explains how the Jeberti, resented, resisted and strongly opposed the hostile and now defunct Haile Sellasie Regime. The paper further shows how these people heartily accepted the outbreak and success of 1974 popular revolution under the banner of which they hope to live, for the first time in their long-lasting history, in a friendly environment and to enjoy full equality and justice. The mention made by the author of a 1952 open-letter published in a local newspaper by the representative of Serae’s Jeberti population as a protest against the electoral manipulation practiced against their interests by the British Administration in Eritrea is both curious and interesting. The letter reveals that the British Administration, though temporary and transitory and, as such, had no direct interest of its own, wronged the Serae’s Jeberti by denying them, in connivance with the Haile Sellasie Government, Their right of representation in the Eritrean Legislative Assembly, through outright ’Gerry mannerism’. Mohammed Nur’s Paper is, as a whole, satisfactory and the author is to be congratulated for undertaking so a tedious task to write en arduous topic and having produced a valuable work in spite of the fact he was, I believe, faced by lack or shortage of bibliographical sources and information’s requires for the subject under discussion and which are not, I reckon, locally available. I hope, however, that the present work will, in future, be amplified- a rather difficult work that can only be realized if he will find an easy access to a number of important libraries abroad and mainly the British Museum Library in London, The Rome, Cairo and other libraries in the Arab World. Yassin M. Aberra
1Wellhausen, Reich, p1 quoted in ”Istituzioni di Diritto Mussulmano
Malichita” by David Santillana, A.R.E.,
P R
E F A C E My present work, I admit, is insufficient but I hope, should an opportunity be presented to me to have an access to the foreign libraries mentioned above, to write more amply on the subject and thus present a more informative and consistent work. In
this paper, I have tried to show, the first and second chapters, how and when
Islamic diffusion took place in Should, by chance, my paper succeed to convey to the reader even a small notion, an idea of what Jeberti are and stand for, I would regard That my humble labour to be amply rewarded.
Mohammed Nur Said
I ”Yonder
The
rise of Islam, which was so decisive event for the history of the world as a
whole had a most marked effect on development in
The troubles in south Arabia have caused a shift in the main direction of
Axumite overseas contact from the
The coming of this people to the country, even though their number was small,
the part they acted was of deep importance in the history of Islam. It showed
the Quaraish that the converts could go to any length and endure any loss
hardship rather than give up the faith of Islam. A bright of self-denial was
exhibited to the whole body of believers who were to regard danger and exile in
” the cause of God ”, as a privilege and distinction. The first flight (Hegira) to Ethiopia as distinguished from the later and more extensive emigrations, gave birth to the idea of a great ”Hegira”, the emigration to Medina, he, too, might have emigrated to Ethiopia.
The Prophet recommended his followers to take refuge in
The Quaraish, dismayed by the defections, sent an ambassador[5]
to the Negus (King) to ask the return of the refugees back to
The friendly attitude to the Axumite Monarch verified the Prophet’s belief that
Having come to learn about the generous behaviours and magnanimity of the Negus
towards the refugees, the Prophet, grateful as he was, recommended his disciples
and followers, as a token of a deep gratitude, ”not to molest the Abyssinians
and leave them always in peace”.
But despite Muhammad’s assurances that there are should be no holy war against
the Abyssinians and the exhortations made by him to his followers to consolidate
the friendly outlook that prevailed in their relations with Abyssinia, the rise
of Islam had disastrous repercussions on the Axumite Empire due to the dynamic
spirit of the new religion which unified and vitalized the Arab peoples and
enabled them to create arrival power which, in self-defence, soon began to
invade neighbouring countries. Faced by the increased pressure of the nascent
new Islamic power and determining to maintain the faith of their fathers, the
Christian sovereigns of
II
There are different kinds of Jeberti, some live in In The Jeberti, in the sense of an Islamic Diaspora to which we are restricting the term, consist of families or groups scattered amongst or mixed up the Christian population of the highlands from whom they cannot physically be distinguished. They cannot even be linguistically differentiated from the others elements with whom they co-exist inasmuch as they speak Amharic, Tigrinya and Agaw depending on the areas they inhabit. They are Ethiopian or Eritrean Muslim who speak the language and preserve the general customs the region in which they live, observing the Sharia law only in matters connected with their religious cult, personal status and family affairs. The
term ”Jeberti” was subsequently also used as the name of a region in the The term ”Jeberti” which derives from the Arabic word ”Jeberna” was first used to denote the first proselytes of Islam in Abyssinia, the word is supposedly uttered by the holy Prophet Muhammad as an expression of gratitude towards the ”Nejashi” the then king of Abyssinia, who offered a generous hospitality to the first Muslim refugee who, escaping from the inhuman persecution of the heathen Arabs, reached the country in search of asylum. When the news of the friendly and brotherly treatment extended to the refugee by the Abyssinian king reached the Prophet, the latter in great delight is said to have uttered the following statement: ”Akhi Ahmad Jeberna” (”My brother Ahmad (the Nejashi) has obliged me”). Such statement to generation among the Jeberti. Hence, the word ”Jeberti” which in the early history of Ethiopian Muslims, referred to all Ethiopians of Muslim confession, came, later on, to distinguish the Tigrinya, Amharic and Agaw speaking Muslim of Ethiopia. The use of the term ”Jeberti” is now confined to Tigrinya speaking Muslims, a large number of whom trace back their genealogical history to the earliest Muslim of Ethiopia, the contemporary of Nejashi. The term “Jeberti” has different meanings. According to the new Tigrinya Dictionary, it means brave, helper, healed, believer etc. According to Abyssinian tradition, the word is derived from Ethiopic Agbert ‘Servant of God’. According to the Jeberti, the word means those stand beside the Prophet at the time of need. Some
of the main Jeberti families claim that they are the descendents of Uthman, Ibn
Affan, the third caliph and husband of Ruckeya, daughter of the Prophet, who, as
amongst the first refugees who reached
According to John Markakis, Islam in the Plateau was associated with trade from
the very beginning and Muslims controlled the The majority of the Ethiopian and Eritrean Muslims, however, owe their conversion to the rapid spread of Islamic teachings and tenets in the Sultanates of South-East Ethiopia and to the fruitful proselytising activities of a number of Muslim Confraternities such as the Shazilia, Quadiria, Ahmedia, Khatimia etc. which appeared and operated as (messianic) missionaries through centuries in the various region of the country.[9] According to Ruppel, the reasons for the success of Islam in Christian regions were the moral superiority of the Muslims over the Christians. Ruppel said the Muslim Jeberti were more active and energetic than the Christians. Most of their children rarely received any education at unless they were destined for the priesthood or monastery. He further said if a trustworthy person were needed to fill any post, a Muslim was usually selected. This too, can be one of the reasons for the success of Islam.[10] The Eritrean Jeberti are mostly in Serae, Akele Guzai and Hamasien and, roughly speaking, their number range between four and five hundred thousands. And a little less than these live scattered abroad, especially in the Arab countries.[11]
These Muslim highlanders, the Islamization of who goes back to the early waves
of Islamic penetration, are, though of the same racial stock as the Christians
of the plateau, Psychologically quite different. Even though the Jeberti and the
Christians belong to the same ethnic group and their relation have been
generally good, there had always been discrimination preached and practiced by
the latter against the former. These discriminations and segregation were not
unknown in the past, particularly when the king of It was around that time, that, a young man by the name of Ahmad Ibrahim Alghazi, known as the Imam Ahmad and nick-named “Gragn” or left-handed (1506-1543), after taking the power from the Sultan of Harar, began what considered his divinely appointed task, the conquest of Christian Ethiopia. The fighting’s began in 1527 when he refused to pay tribute to the king of Ethiopia and lasted 16 years, that is, till a little after 1543, the year which marked the death of Imam Ahmad.[13] The
traditional Ethiopian Christian concept of ‘nationality’ excluded non-Christians
from participation in the affair of the state, barred them from holding public
office and, in the most cases, deprived them of the right to own land. In other
words, they ruthlessly and relentlessly harassed their no –Christians
country-men, especially the Muslims. Referring to the powerful and reactionary
influence that several monastic communities of monk and nuns exercised on the
Coptic populations of the “This (i.e. the powerful influence of the monks and nuns referred to above) to some extent accounts for the severe intolerance of the Christians for the Moslem minority. With few exception the Jeberti or the ‘elect’, as Moslems are known, are denied any rights in land, are treated as social outcasts, and live as traders and craftsmen. Not surprisingly the great majority have today sought in the less intolerant society of the town”.[14] In
1667-82, Yohannes I forbade the Muslims living with the Christians and forced
them to settle separate villages or separate quarters as the Jews were confined
to “ghettos” in As history teach us that the conflicts between the Christians and Jeberti persisted specially during the reign of the Yohannes IV. Persecution and oppression, which reached its zenith during the terrifying realm of Yohannes IV, continued during the Eritrean Administration and Haile Sellasie Regime.
Yohannes IV was the most fanatic Christian Ruler and his reign was characterized
by constant hostility and harassing of the Muslims; his main aim was to make In
spite of the fact that Yohannes IV exercised his bigoted belief and murdered
Muslim in the name of Christ, some of his trusted soldiers who fought under his
command for sake of the country were Jeberti. One of them, worthy of note, was
called Berhanu who, despite his strong disapproval of Yohannes’ anti-Islamic
policy, fought, never less, against the Italian invaders, in defence of his
country. A quarter of the town of Berhanu was not only the one who can be quoted as an example of valiant patriotism who offered his life for the sake of the Fatherland. Were it not for the lack of space and time I would have quoted a horde of others like him. From
narrations transmitted to posterity by Jeberti, contemporaries of Yohannes IV,
we learn that the latter, immediately following his capture of Ethiopia Throne,
proved to be a wise king, a just administrator and a patriot. These
characteristics won to him the loyalty and their usurped rights, offered and
actually extended to him their earnest service and heartily support. In fact, a
number of their sage elders volunteered to offer him their earnest advices and
financial aids. The Emperor welcomed such altruistic assistances. Yohannes IV,
however, falling, afterwards, victim to the ill advices of unwise, shortsighted
and bigot members of the Orthodox Clergy changed his political attitude toward
Muslim and, subsequently, adopted a disruptive new policy. This policy aimed at
the forced conversion of all Ethiopian Muslim into Christianity thus to bring
about an alleged ‘national unity’. Ethiopian Muslims, in general, and the
Jeberti, in particular, abhorring such insane policy and ill-advised ambition,
had to revise their amicable relationship with the Government of Yohannes IV and
began to look at it not only with great suspicion but also with hatred. When
persecution of Yohannes ‘State reached its apex, the Jeberti decided to organize
them with a view to securing the survival of their religion. A small army, under
the command of Fitawrary Nuru Waddi Fukra, was organized and a guerrilla
fighting was conducted in
While Yohannes IV was intent to carry on his prosaic and futile work, the
Italians army started its occupation of the northern part of *Following the end of the British colonization, the Eritrean Autonomous Unit or Administration came into existence. During the British and the Eritrean Administration period, too, many injustices were committed against the Jeberti. Their rights to be elected to the Eritrean Assembly were shrewdly denied by outright gerrymanderistic practices. But, although many people talked, wrote and re-wrote about it, the reaction was a dead ear to their complaints. The complaints against failure to give due representation to the Jeberti in the Eritrean Assembly, at its inception, were raised to the British Chief Secretary. This is evidence by the following letter, which was published in the 1952 in a local newspaper:
“To: The Chief Secretary, B.A.E., Though S.D.O. Serae Division. Subject: Elections
Sir:
We have previously submitted similar memorandum as well as had talks the U.N.O.
In accordance with Proclamation No: 121 promulgated by H.E. the Chief
We, therefore ask for a redress of the wrong committed against us by correcting
the This was one of the letters submitted to demonstrate the dissatisfaction of the Jeberti.
After the liberation of Ethiopia and the restoration of the National Government
and when Eritrea became, in 1952, an integral part of Ethiopia, Haile Sellasie,
following the ancient dictum’ divide et imperia’, introduced a disruptive and
segregating policy which made the Muslim to feel alien in their own country. He
believed and actually strived to make the world to believe that
The educational policy[20]
of the Haile Sellasie Government caused special problems for the Muslim
Communities of Eritrea and The policy of the ex-Emperor was, in general, to exclude non-Christians from participation in the affairs of state, to bar them from appointment to public offices and from adequate representation of Muslims in the Parliament. The door of military career, as well, was almost closed before them; military career was conditioned, in the most cases, with conversion to Christianity. The
revolution of 1974, however, tried to smash the chain of national oppression,
recognized equality of all Ethiopians, abolished the old enmity between
Christians and Muslims and tried to clear the way for their all round
co-operation for the common good. It equally gave everyone the right to decide
on his fate, to dignify his national statehood, to develop the Nation’s economy
and culture thus to raise the living standards of all-Ethiopian
indiscriminately. The new Ethiopia, which was a land for everyone, however,
the1974 Revolution was “hijacked by Mengistu and” (Mengistu) could do so only
because the society was still atomized, still (embroiled) in internal rivalries
and jealousies not allowing (groups) to cooperate, to enable them to organize in
time of crisis. The Mengistu regime continued with old traditional
politics-individualistic politics. Mengistu destroyed the Derg and used as a
mask the empty framework of the Workers Party for individualistic power. “ Part
of
III
There are many ethnic groups living scattered in the various regions of
According to Professor Simoons[22]
there are nine principal native ethnic groups in the north- west The first Ethnic group belongs to Amhara, who are politically powerful and predominantly Christians. The others are the Tigrinya-speaking Christians, the Falashas, the Jeberti, (latter two speak the language of the people among whom they live and are set apart on the basis of their religion), the Wayt, who are a small group of Moslem fisherman and live along the shores of lake Tana, and three who are Agaw-speakers, the Kumfel, the Agaw of Sohalla and the Kamant, and the Gumis. These people are surprisingly similar not only in their physical appearance but also in their culture, even though some of them differ in religion and social life. Their agricultural methods, and cultivated plants are, as well, the same. Prof. Simoons has stressed on the common traits that prevail among the above-mentioned ethnic groups and made little stress on their dissimilarities. Their differences, which relate to culture, mental attitude, customs and tradition, history and other social aspects, are, in the most cases, sharp. Take, for example, the case of Jeberti. These people, although of the same ethnic group of the Tigrinya-speaking Christian highlanders, differ sharply in culture, psychological set up, mental attitude, socio-political outlook and in the other fields. Such cultural and other differentiations, which bestow upon the Jeberti a distinguished identity, are attributable to the enrichment of their Axumite culture by solid tenets imparted upon them by the Islamic civilization. Islam, as it were, is not only a religion but also ’a way of life’ and, as such, moulds, to a great extent, the value judgment, the mental attitude and behaviour of a true Muslim. The Islamic legacy which is deeply penetrated into the way of life of the Jeberti and which modified and modelled, to a great degree, their mental attitude and behaviour. There is not exaggeration at all to assert that the Jeberti are the synthesis of two great civilizations: the Axumite and the Islamic cultural and social evolutions. Hence, the Jeberti become different from their Christian brethren in their social political outlooks. The impact of their religion makes them believe in social, economic and political equalities. This religious influence, for example, makes them to venerate work, trade and agriculture; they look at any handicraft and commerce with great respect. As Ethiopian of Axumite culture, with some modification introduced by Islam, possess and follow a code of social behaviour, which is ranked as of high level and desirable. : Their attitude towards, and practices in marriage and funeral ceremonies are quite different from those of their Christians brothers. In marriage ceremonies, no intoxicating beverages are offered nor intermingling of two sexes is permitted. The traditional practices in matrimonial celebrations imparted upon them by Axumite civilization have been modified and simplified in consonance with the Islamic teaching. Likewise, funeral ceremonies are also made totally different from those in vogue among the Christians of their ethnic group: no women is permitted to accompany the rests of the deceased to the cemetery, nor alien women and men intermingle in such and in other occasions. Simplicity, in short, dominates all their social relations. On the other hand, they radically differ from all Muslims of others ethnic groups or social conglomerations by very fact that the Jeberti cultural wealth is unique and quite different from those of the others. Even though the Jeberti mother tongue is Tigrinya and, if needs must be, they can correctly converse through this medium, the language spoken among themselves differ, to a large extent, from that employed by their Christian brethren: because of Islamic training through the study of the Koran and the Holy Prophet’s traditions or sayings, they use quite a number of Arabic words, phraseology and terminology, anecdotes, proverbs and adages in their daily speeches, a Tigrinya speaking Christian would hardly understand or follow a discussion or debate conducted by the Jeberti among themselves.
2 Punkhurst R. ” AN
INTRODUCTION TO THE ECONOMIC HISTORY OF
From Early Times to 1800, ( 3 Ibid, p. 49
7 Trimingham J. S., op. cit.
pp 150 – 153; Ullendorf, “ THE ETHIOPIANS “
(
8 John Markakis, “
(Addis Abeba, Oxford University Press, 1974) p. 113.
10 Ruppel, “ REISE IN ABESSINIEN “ (Frankfurt, 1838) , pp 327 –
8, 366
14 G.k.N. Trevaskis, ”
17 Eritrean Weekly News, 1952. 21 Erlich Haggai, lecture entitled “ ETHIOPIA AND ERITREA “ (AIDDA)
|
||
|
The views expressed in articles published on Arkokabay.com are those of the authors alone. They do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of Arakokabay.com or its Editorial Board |
ما ينشر من مقالات في موقع عركوكباي.كوم يعبر عن رأي صاحبه ولا يعبر بالضرورة عن رأي الموقع والقائمين عليه. |
|
|
Send mail to Arkokabay with questions, comments, opinions and/or articles |
||
|
2006-05-24 21:41 :Copyright © 2005 Last modified |
||